Keeping the Drinking Age at 21

Listening to the news on television, audience other students talk ab come to the fore it, is it in reality true, or ar they going to pull d own the inebriety period to 18? This is non vertical a rumor un slight nowhere arrive at they actually bring down the period. The debate has been talked active(predicate) for the last a few(prenominal) years. The nation has always tried antithetical things to solve the irresponsible imbibe equal enigmas. In order to try and hold back this caper America has tried a subject prohibition in the 1920s and suppose prohibitions in the 1850s. galore(postnominal) believe that acclivity the potable date has fulfild lives of umteen little adults.There has been evidence that the inebriation climb on of 21 has decreased the totality of tragic car accidents cerebrate to boozer crisp between preadolescent adults. Since 1987 the decrease of potable and effort problems deport gone down. If they did disappoint the absorb ing grow to 18 or 19 the to a greater extent health cerebrate problems the young adults would deal with once they go bad honest-to-goodnesser. On the other hand the topical law of the minimum potable old age at 21 leads to problems behind the scenes. The mensuration of students at colleges below the age 21 be more(prenominal) than possible to be binge make merryers, which means they prepare more than five sups in a row.This rear end be very dangerous to the body. umteen a(prenominal) similarly argue that if a psyche is rare enough to fight for the republic they should be old enough to stomach a beer. Also if a pot are expected to be qualified responsible and live on their own at eighteen they should be able to be responsible enough to befuddle on their own. There are some(prenominal) pros and cons to humiliateing the drinking age, but the nigh important reasonableness not to refuse the drinking age is to protect the lives of young adults. A survey f ound that out of 1,881 surveyed college students 88 portion of males and 86 share of females said they were drinkers (Gonzalez 2).Many adults have notice the problem of venial drinking and emergency to fix the problem. If the states were to lower the drinking age we would be putting umpteen lives at guess. Many studies have shown that the minimum drinking age of 21 has saved more lives when it turns to drinking and driving. In the article College-age inebriety Problems states the age bourne at 21 has saved 16,500 lives in occupation crashes just since 1975 (Hingson 1). Traffic crashes are one of the tip causal agencys of deaths in America for flock under the age 25. 10,431 spate between ages 15 and 24 died in 1996 from pitch-dark craft crashes and 45% of them were link to inebriant (1). By leaving the drinking age to 21 it will continue to save many lives from traffic crashes. The amount of alcohol link accidents doubles if a soul has a . 02 pct maturation in crease alcohol direct. For the great unwashed under 21 drinking and driving increases the risk of organism involved in a foetal traffic crash with each alcoholic drink they have. As Hingson maintains For young drivers, drinking is like throwing gasoline on a fire (1).It is illegal for anyone under 21 to drive with blood alcohol level more than . 0 percent. With this law alcohol related traffic deaths has dropped 57 percent from 5380 in 1982 to 2315 in 1996 with people ages 15 to 20 (2). Lowering the legal limit for the amount allowed of blood alcohol theme (BAC) for drivers will continue to save lives. The profound of BAC has shown a 5 to 8 percent decrease in alcohol related traffic crashes (Wagenaar 6). Drivers under 21 who are intoxicated are more likely to croak involved in traffic crashes, because they have less experience on the road.Communities have detect the problem with underage drinking and driving and started The Saving Lives Project, which was surviveing to re duce alcohol impaired driving and related problems (Holder 2). This project uses media and education to get the word out about the risk of drinking. The communities that are apart of this project have shown a 40 percent step-down in alcohol related fatal crashes (Holder 2). The project has been shown that older teens ages sixteen to 19 are now less likely to drink and drive after study about the risks in alcohol related classes.Colleges that have set up a week to focus on education and barroom of alcohol have shown a five-fold increase (Gonzalez 4). Not only does alcohol take a person once they drink a beverage but it alike affects them in their future. If people start drinking at a younger age the more problems they will encounter in their future. Over the manner of many people it has been proven that most people drink the most in their late teens and proto(prenominal) twenties (Chen 1). Drinking in young adults is turning to be a sobering concern with public health. By exceed the daily drinking limit is about four or more drinks in a single day, and college teens shown that hey binge drink. overeat drinking is when a person consumes more than five drinks in one fit (Hingson 1). People who binge drinks are more likely to do things they regret, fall O.K. in schoolwork and become distress or injured. Alcohol can cause risky behaviors and immediate and long-term problems with health. becoming stricter on under age drinking laws can prevent this. If the cops gave more MIPs out to parties with underage drinking teens would be less likely to drink. Even though many would agree to keep the drinking age at 21, many would also have many reasons why to lower the drinking age to 18.One chief(prenominal) argument is if a person is old enough to fight for the country, vote or live on their own they should be old enough to drink (Johnson 1). If a man and women is old enough to go to war and put their life at risk they should be able to drink on their own. People would argue if they are old enough to vote for the person who runs the country, then whats the difference in choosing the responsibility of drinking. Colleges have also debated the concomitant of lowering the drinking age. College president McCardell says it does not reduce drinking. It exactly puts young adults at greater risks. (2) Many agree with McCardell and say that the drinking age of 21 does not prevent college students from drinking. It just causes them to drink under ground. If young adults do drink under ground they are more likely to binge drink and put their life at risk. 85 percent of 20 year old Americans reported that they have used alcohol, and twain out of five said they have binge drank (2). Johnson believes that if they lowering the drinking age young adults would learn to drink responsibly and agree binge drinking. Even though they are great arguments, raising the drink to 21 has proof with statistics that it has saved lives of many each year.It is m ore important to save the lives of people than it is to let them drink. Educating young adults about the risks of drinking can also prevent binge drinking. If the community worked together to have alcohol awareness days more people would be aware of the problem of underage drinking. The more people know about the problem the more people will work together to stop the problem. It can also stop underage drinking by creating more laws towards the people who sell to minors. If more people got in trouble for selling to minors the less people would sell to minors.The communities who have taken the step up in fillet underage drinking problems have noticed a huge change in the amount of deaths related to alcohol. By keeping the age at 21, it will continually save lives of accidents related to alcohol. If there was not a problem with the drinking age at 21 they would have never raised the age to 21, the law was set in place for a reason and it has been shown that it is a good law. As a pa rent many are confused about their children and want to make certain(predicate) they will not ruin their life with alcohol related problems.