Cyber Security for Physical System- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theCyber Security for Physical System. Answer: Literature Review Physical system of cyber security is capable of adding some intelligence to the social life and associating the virtual world with the physical world. The Physical devices like cameras and sensors has integrated with the components of the cyber security and an analytical system has been form to respond to the dynamic changes in every scenario of the real-world. There is a wide range of application in the Cyber Security of Physical System that include the smart medical technology, environmental control, traffic management and assisted living. Cyber Security physical system is the integration of Cloud Computing and WSN. In one of the research methodology, the architecture of Cyber Security Physical System capture several different physical information, event detection, data analysis that are reliable, and security. The Cyber Security with its Physical System have several benefits that integrate the cyber and the physical world. The physical system is interoperable with Cloud Computing and WSNs that provide some standards to networking. There are multiple platforms that involve physical system conceptually that are interacting through a communication networks. The characteristics of network integration is provided by the Physical System of Cyber security. One of them is the media access control technique whose effects are on the system dynamic, software, and middleware for coordination over the networks, fault tolerances and network transactions timing control. The Physical system of Cyber Security provide another benefit that is the interaction between the System and the Human. The human perception and the system situational awareness with its changing environment that are critical parameter for decision making for dynamic and complex systems. Human has now become an essential part of the system through which it becomes easier for interaction because it has become difficult to model a human with the use of standalone systems. The Physical System of Cyber Security is a design that operate and evolve with unreliable and new environment. The unknown system of Cyber security demonstrate the behaviour of further study and develop into an improved system. With enhanced system interaction of cyber infrastructure and sensors, the Physical System of Cyber Security provide better performance with regard to feedback and automatic redesign. The Physical System ensure with better computational resources and the CPU subsystems with multiple sensing enti ties, end-user maintenance, multiple communication mechanisms and high-level programming language. This ensures the performance of the Physical system to be better. In one of the research it was found that the properties of Cloud Computing is utilize by the Physical system of Cyber Security as it is able to scale the system. Without any investment in the additional resources, there are some necessary infrastructure that are acquire by the users. The Cyber Security Physical System combines with the physical dynamics that are inherently heterogeneous with the computational processes. It may happen that the domain of the cyber combine the software modelling, programming tools, and network infrastructure. Simultaneously, the physical domain combine the chemical processes, mechanical motion control, human involvement and biological processes. Some design methodologies and tools can be provided by the physical system of cyber security with large scale design and understanding of the systems complexity. Due to sensor cloud integration, the physical system provide autonomy. However, the physical system of Cyber Security is a closes-loop system. The sensors of the system make some of the physical dynamics measurements. All the process of measurement are done in the cyber subsystems. These drive the applications and the actuators that has affected the physical processes. Flexibility is provided by the Physical System of the Cyber Sec urity. The system also provide fast response as it has the capability to process and communicate faster through sensor and infrastructure of the cloud. Bibliography Ashibani, Y. and Mahmoud, Q.H., 2017. Cyber physical systems security: Analysis, challenges and solutions.Computers Security,68, pp.81-97. Lawlor, O., Bogosyan, S., Vural, Y., Thompson, I., Moss, M. and Gokasan, M., 2015, November. AERO-beam: An open-architecture test-bed for research and education in cyber-physical systems. InIndustrial Electronics Society, IECON 2015-41st Annual Conference of the IEEE(pp. 005080-005086). IEEE. Nguyen, P.H., Ali, S. and Yue, T., 2017. Model-based security engineering for cyber-physical systems: A systematic mapping study.Information and Software Technology,83, pp.116-135. Frey, S., Rashid, A., Zanutto, A., Busby, J. and Follis, K., 2016, May. On the role of latent design conditions in cyber-physical systems security. InSoftware Engineering for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems (SEsCPS), 2016 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on(pp. 43-46). IEEE. Malchow, J.O., Marzin, D., Klick, J., Kovacs, R. and Roth, V., 2015, September. Plc guard: A practical defense against attacks on cyber-physical systems. InCommunications and Network Security (CNS), 2015 IEEE Conference on(pp. 326-334). IEEE. Medhat, R., Bonakdarpour, B., Kumar, D. and Fischmeister, S., 2015. Runtime monitoring of cyber-physical systems under timing and memory constraints.ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS),14(4), p.79. Snchez, B.B., Alcarria, R., de Rivera, D.S. and Snchez-Picot, ., 2016. Enhancing Process Control in Industry 4.0 Scenarios using Cyber-Physical Systems.JoWUA,7(4), pp.41-64. Cardenas, A., Amin, S., Sinopoli, B., Giani, A., Perrig, A. and Sastry, S., 2009, July. Challenges for securing cyber physical systems. InWorkshop on future directions in cyber-physical systems security(Vol. 5). Lee, E.A., 2008, May. Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. InObject oriented real-time distributed computing (isorc), 2008 11th ieee international symposium on(pp. 363-369). IEEE. Lei, C.U., Liang, H.N. and Man, K.L., 2013, August. Building a smart laboratory environment at a university via a cyber-physical system. InTeaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 2013 IEEE International Conference on(pp. 243-247). IEEE. Peter, S., Momtaz, F. and Givargis, T., 2015, October. From the browser to the remote physical lab: Programming cyber-physical systems. InFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015 IEEE(pp. 1-7). IEEE. Bou-Harb, E., 2016, November. A Brief Survey of Security Approaches for Cyber-Physical Systems. InNew Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), 2016 8th IFIP International Conference on(pp. 1-5). IEEE.